Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Charles Broom vs George Houghton Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Broom vs Houghton analysis and find out who is favored!
Charles Broom vs George Houghton Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Broom has won 52.4% of points on his second serve, while Houghton has won 47.59%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Broom, in recent form, has won 56.16% of his opponent's second serve points, while Houghton has won 51.06%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.77% and 31.34% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Broom has saved 64.44% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Houghton has saved 55.4% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Broom has won 61.25% of matches played (W/L 49/ 31), with Houghton winning 52.17% (W/L 24/ 22) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Broom has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 44/ 22), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 59% (W/L 52/ 36). Houghton has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 56% (W/L 35/ 28), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Broom has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 68.89% of matches (W/L 31/ 14), where as Houghton has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 54.55% of matches (W/L 24/ 20). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Broom winning 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Broom winning 3 and Houghton winning 2. The last match between Broom and Houghton was at the M25 Nottingham, 25-04-2024, Second, Hard with Charles Broom getting the victory 6-2 7-6(3).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:54:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Broom and Houghton have played a deciding set 1 times, with Broom winning 0 times and Houghton 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Broom winning 1, and Houghton 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Broom has played against opponents with an average rank of 220.66 while Houghton has played against players with an average rank of 128.04.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Broom has won 58% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Houghton has won 57% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Broom has converted 36.94% of breakpoint opportunities, and Houghton has converted 42.18% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Broom 1 - 1 Houghton
313
Rank
313
High
26
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
1
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
Plays
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
Form
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
63% (205-118)
Career Total W/L
54% (77-66)
63% (20-12)
YTD W/L
52% (11-10)
$36,000
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Charles Broom | George Houghton |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 3 | 2 |
| Games Won | 26 | 23 |
| Aces (Total) | 16 | 17 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:54:0 | 1:54:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (89/129) | 59% (92/157) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 78% (69/89) | 70% (64/92) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 57% (23/40) | 46% (30/65) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 38% (5/13) | 57% (4/7) |
| Return Points W% | 40% (63/157) | 29% (37/129) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 7-6(3) |
Stats 
Charles Broom
Player
George Houghton
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
74)
8
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
37 of
74)
78
Total Points Won
58
|
||||
| 6-4 3-6 6-3 |
Stats
George Houghton
Player
Charles Broom
58%
(
48 of
83)
1st Serve %
69%
(
46 of
67)
12
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
2
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
38 of
46)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
26 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
24%
(
16 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
77
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Charles Broom | George Houghton |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 63% (20/12) | 52% (11/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 59% (46/32) | 52% (25/23) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (392/354) | 52% (244/228) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 68% (13/6) | 64% (7/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 54% (7/6) | 40% (4/6) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.54 | 0.42 |
| Aces Total | 198 | 96 |
| DFs per game | 0.22 | 0.2 |
| DFs Total | 81 | 46 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:54:12 | 1:34:41 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 203.78 | 155.14 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (1497/2329) | 61% (771/1268) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (1054/1497) | 73% (563/771) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (436/832) | 47% (235/497) |
| BPs Won% Total | 37% (99/268) | 41% (56/136) |
| Return Pts W% | 41% (1030/2519) | 39% (537/1366) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 45% (5/6) | 0% (0/2) |
| Futures W/L | 71% (15/6) | 58% (11/8) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 63% (20/32) | 52% (11/21) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 64% (7/11) | 20% (1/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 57% (8/14) | 50% (3/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 83% (18/15) | 91% (11/10) |
| 1st set W, L | 17% (18/3) | 9% (11/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 36% (14/5) | 10% (10/1) |
Charles Broom Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Blake Mott
Player
Charles Broom
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
86)
2
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
2
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
37 of
52)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
31 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
86)
84
Total Points Won
84
|
6-3 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Henry Searle
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
62%
(
44 of
71)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Blake Mott
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
73%
(
43 of
59)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Robert Strombachs
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve %
77%
(
48 of
62)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
26 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Alexis Canter
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Alex Knaff
59%
(
53 of
90)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
87)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
65%
(
24 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
38%
(
34 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
87)
90
Total Points Won
87
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Charles Broom
73%
(
66 of
90)
1st Serve %
69%
(
63 of
91)
5
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
0
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
42 of
63)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
40%
(
36 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
91)
92
Total Points Won
89
|
3-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Giles Hussey
62%
(
56 of
91)
1st Serve %
61%
(
59 of
97)
3
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
46%
(
42 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
45 of
97)
94
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Finn Bass
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
88%
(
29 of
33)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
31%
(
4 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
George Houghton
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
74)
8
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
37 of
74)
78
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
George Houghton Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Toby Martin
Player
George Houghton
73%
(
58 of
79)
1st Serve %
64%
(
41 of
64)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
38%
(
30 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
80
Total Points Won
63
|
6-0 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
George Houghton
Player
David Quayle
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
65)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
65)
63
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 2-6 10-7 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
George Houghton
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
74)
8
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
37 of
74)
78
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
George Houghton
Player
Hamish Stewart
73%
(
53 of
73)
1st Serve %
60%
(
43 of
72)
1
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
31 of
43)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
29%
(
21 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
George Houghton
Player
Liam Delicata
50%
(
33 of
66)
1st Serve %
55%
(
49 of
89)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
6
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
42%
(
28 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
46 of
89)
84
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
George Houghton
Player
Jack Gibbens
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve %
82%
(
61 of
74)
6
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
80%
(
37 of
46)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
17 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
79
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(7) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Koray Kirci
Player
George Houghton
74%
(
67 of
90)
1st Serve %
47%
(
46 of
98)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
30 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
98)
100
Total Points Won
88
|
6-3 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
George Houghton
Player
Tamas Belafalvi-Balint
55%
(
16 of
29)
1st Serve %
53%
(
24 of
45)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
100%
(
16 of
16)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
92%
(
12 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
3%
(
1 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
55
Total Points Won
19
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
George Houghton
Player
Joe Tyler
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
68%
(
47 of
69)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
32%
(
7 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
47%
(
27 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
37 of
69)
67
Total Points Won
59
|
4-6 6-3 10-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Broom Vs Houghton Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
